Powermock maven setup

You're using Before which is junit4 annotation.. Also, your import for Test are from junit4 but not from junit5 That should be org. As your link suggests, still you can't do power mock stuff with junit-5 directly, simply because there's no PowerMockRunner Extension still available for junit Here, note that you are using when of mockito by import static org.

Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Asked 1 year, 7 months ago. Active 1 month ago. Viewed 40k times. Before; import org. Test; import org. RunWith; import org. PowerMockito; import org. PowerMockIgnore; import org. PrepareForTest; import org. PowerMockRunner; import static org.

Improve this question. Progman I disagree with your comment : — Kervvv. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Tomasz Tomasz 2 2 silver badges 6 6 bronze badges. Jack Jack 19 6 6 bronze badges. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow.

Learn more. Which Maven artifacts should I use to import PowerMock? Ask Question. Asked 8 years, 4 months ago. Active 3 years, 5 months ago.

Viewed 77k times. Improve this question. Line 1, 3 3 gold badges 14 14 silver badges 37 37 bronze badges. I have to know which jar to begin with! Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Community Bot 1 1 1 silver badge. Jeff Bowman Jeff Bowman Are you sure that no other dependencies are needed?

There is no code throwing exceptions. I have looked through the source of powermock-module-junit4 and powermock-api-mockito and I cannot see the PrepareForTest annotation. Can you tell me what jar contains PrepareForTest in version 1.

However, since you can chase the same transitive dependencies from powermock-api-mockito in your question, it looks like maybe you set up Eclipse in such a way that transitive Maven dependencies aren't being pulled in. We'd need to know a little more about your Eclipse setup before figuring out that part, though. Jeff's answer is still correct based on the information we have.

Were you ever able to get past this issue? Line Those two were fine, but the text edits were too far for me--punctuation was incorrect and TestNG details made the answer harder to follow--and I had no "improve" or "partially accept" buttton, just "reject". Though your edit had other approvers, there was at least one other reviewer who rejected for the same reason, and your edit log likely shows that full text reason.

Please be mindful when your edits change a post's meaning. Show 5 more comments. Make sure you have this import: import org.